A time in top of a moment a new world lode ahead in etherspace vast known as the " net ". With this world the birth came the peoples who had populated it, with the ability to inside create and to destroy any thing of the size of one mote of the dust until villages or entire worlds of the world.

Unhappyly, many of these peoples could not spell for beanses.

In the defense of self, a league of +Grammar Nazi above jumped, to atrocities battling in the spelling, the grammar, and the punctuation dedicated. These GN, while they had come to be known, had wandered the world, looking for for it are of the offences shining its eyeballs, and had undertaken @ a war of the post office to stamp for it are of these errors hideous when found.

Its creed: " it is is not, he is not ain't, and he is it it is, not its, if you to mean that it is. If you not, he is its. Then too much, it is of it. She is not it. He is not ours neither. He is ours, and in a similar way its and undoes " (gratefulness to zingdol)

But some commentaries:

• it is is used for it is
• its is possessive (no apostrophe)
• you it is is for you is
• its is possessive
• they are are for them are
• its is possessive
• it has a place
• who is is for who is
• of who he is possessive (they are you who see a test here standard)
• who is a direct or indirect object. Same former way uses it it that you would use it or: " to who they are you who give? " ' ' the thing is the direct object - that is being acted upon. ' who ' is the indirect object - receiving of the direct object.
• it he is used as it follows: " we are going to the store " " I we gave-lhea. "
• he is used too much in the place of also, or the extremities: " that he is too much stranger! " " they are you who go there too much? "
• two are a number: " I have two apples. I gave one to it. Now he has one too much! This is too much nifty! "

Nobody is exempt of the eye watchful of the grammar Nazi. In consequence, the allies of the grammar had been loaded. This small force of spellers horrible undertakes the war in the grammar Nazi. They are not imported as things of speel, and none of them dikshuneary possesss one. They commit errors of spelling frequently purposeful to only give to attention to grind of GN its teeth in the agony.

That war would be complete without the neutral forces, though? It incorporates the Fuzzies grammar. As Yoda they speke, as Chaucer they spele. In the eternal war between the Nazi grammar and the ally of the grammar, Switzerland is. It speaks correctly, but the sound that curses stranger. Obviously a strange group, but is necessary the end to become rounded itself for is of the experience of the grammar of Dawn.

E that one is the history of the group of the grammar.

I assume that you want to go you stop backw ards now to the Home Page?

For more info you can send Jenn in jenn@aurora.org.au

WE NOW RETURN YOU TO YOUR PREVIOUSLY SCHEDULED ENTERTAINMENT